| The necessity of using a
design and construction capable of relieving or eliminating toque on the
abutment teeth of a partial prosthesis has long been recognized. No
single answer exists in how best to achieve the desired end result.
Part of the problem is the infinite number of variations
encountered in the condition of the oral cavity which influences the design
and construction of a partial prosthesis. A major factor to be
considered in the designing of a partial with distal extension saddles is
the number of posterior teeth missing. The larger the
edentulous area, the larger is the occlusal load to be shared with the
remaining teeth.
To be considered also is the status of the opposing
dentition. If a lower partial is opposed by a full
denture, the resulting occlusal force generated is decidedly less than the
forces generated with all or part of the natural teeth intact. Often
one observes where normal healing of the edentulous area after tooth
extraction has not taken place. The patient may have been informed to
come back within a certain time frame for a relining of the saddles.
Frequently, the patient will ignore the set appointment.
If this occurs, rapid resorption is inevitable with the resulting damage to
the abutment tooth. Since approximately 75% of the partial lower and
65% of partial upper restorations involve distal extension saddles, solving
the problem of relieving the abutment teeth of excessive stress is of prime
importance, particularly if the abutments show loss of bone support.
The typical removable partial denture is a one-piece casting
with clasps, a lingual bar, or in the case of an upper restoration, either a
horseshoe type or a palatal bar which is rigidly connected with the saddle
retention necessary for securing the acrylic saddles. It is generally
recognized that as long as the denture saddles remain in contact with the
tissue, moderate occlusal forces can be absorbed without causing damage to
the abutment teeth.
The damage occurs when the ridge resorption
takes place. On a partial prosthesis where all or most of the
posterior teeth are missing, the restoration, in effect, becomes a Class I
lever with the occlusal rests as fulcrum points. Furthermore, ridge
resorption, due to the patient's chewing habits of favoring one side of the
arch over the other, is very seldom equal, causing a further strain on the
abutment teeth. This condition can easily be verified. When the
saddles are relined, the thickness of the reline material from one saddle to
the other can vary greatly. A solution favored by some dentists is the
use of a buccal wrought wire arm of approximately 18 gauge. It is true
that the strain on the abutment is reduced; again, however, if ridge
resorption takes place, tipping action of the abutment teeth will occur.
Orthodontic wire of even thinner gauge is used to move teeth. Another
factor to be considered in the use of wrought wire arms is the loss of
retentive power when undercut conditions are often insufficient for a
wrought wire clasp, but more than adequate for a more rigid properly tapered
chrome cobalt cast clasp.
Another approach in relieving stress on the abutments
is the use of stress-reducing attachments. Sixty years ago,
Dr. Kennedy, who made the use of the Kennedy bar popular, had this to say
about the use of stress breaker:
"Since the advent of the cast clasp and the
removable bridge, a great number have advocated the use of 'stress
breakers' between their saddles and the clasps. These have been
shown to be absolutely essential by dentists who had used cast clasps for
partial dentures. They found that in a short time the teeth to which
such clasps were attached loosened, and that this was due mainly the
rigidity of the clasp."
To add to this quote, with the popularity of precision
attachments increasing, the same reason for using a stress reducer is
equally applicable to rigid precision attachments.
Sixty years ago, the stress-equalizing attachments
available at that time were made from plastic patterns, and after casting
allowed excessive lateral play, which frequently caused soreness in the
edentulous areas. Today, a number of attachments precision prefabricated in
metal are available, and if properly applied, will assure lateral stability.
The most universally used attachment is the
DSE Hinge. The
Distal Stress Release Trunnion attachment, which came on the market in 1953,
has recently been improved. The new design is much smaller with a
width of three millimeters and a vertical height of one and a half
millimeters. The simplicity of the laboratory phase, and the
durability and economy of this attachment have contributed to the popularity
and acceptance by the dental profession of this stress-equalizing
attachment. The attachment can be used on both conventional clasp
cases and in conjunction with a variety of precision attachments.
There is a fundamental difference in the use and
function of the Distal Stress Equalizer when compared with other
stress-breaking devices. The illustrations will explain the difference
in function of the DSE and other attachments. |